Friday, August 1, 2008

Bill C-61 goes beyond downloading

By Emily Davies, Assistant News Editor

English professor Laura Murray says Bill C-61 would eliminate the University’s ability to take advantage of fair dealing. (Lindsay Duncan)

A proposed change to copyright law could change the way Canadians share media. It could also have a negative impact on the education system, said English professor Laura Murray.

Bill C-61, first read to the House of Commons by Federal Industry Minister Jim Prentice on June 12, outlines the provisions for copying media and fills in the grey areas not covered by existing copyright laws.

Under current copyrighting laws, Canadians aren’t allowed to copy newspapers, books, periodicals, photographs, videocassettes and music. Under Bill C-61, users would be allowed one copy of each item per individual media device such as an iPod and would also be permitted to record television and radio programs for later use.

An anti-circumvention clause in the bill would make it illegal to break digital locks on copyrighted material, nullifying the new allowances for most digital media.

Murray, also the author of the book Copyright: A Citizens Guide said, If passed, the bill could have a serious effect on Canadian universities.

“Decoding is being criminalized when there are a lot of legitimate purposes for it, especially regarding education,” she said.

But, Murray said the bill would make it illegal to get around digital locks, which are designed to prevent the reformatting and copying of contents found on DVDs, cell phones and other digital devices.

“The bill, if passed, would give the owner the ability to lock up material many different ways.”

Murray said Bill C-61 would also eliminate the university’s ability to take advantage of fair dealing, which allows students to download online journal articles and broadcast journalists the right to show clips from movies and newsreels without the permission of the copyright owner. The determination of what is considered “fair” is left to courts on a case by case basis.

“Everyone needs to understand fair dealing so that they know what they’re losing. This whole idea that users have rights is foreign to many people,” she said. “Fair dealing will be virtually impossible if the owners decide to block it out. To me, they’re giving up on the principle, ‘some things are free.’ That’s wrong, and we shouldn’t have to apologize for it.”

Under the current Copyright Act, the public is able to legally quote from digital sources for the purposes of private study, research criticism, review and news reporting.

“We [the University] certainly hope it doesn’t pass … the public should be as familiar with the concept of fair dealing as they are familiar with the term copyright,” Murray said. “At a university we need fair dealing in order to do research, it will mean less audio visual material will be used in the classroom and will provide barriers to students who want to use digital materials in the classroom.”

Film studies professor Blaine Allan said he’s been educating himself about the effect Bill C-61 could have on the film department.

“We regularly, for the sake of convenience, make copies of digital materials to show clips from movies and other film mediums,” he said.

Allan said if Bill C-61 is passed, he might have to bend the law in order to continue to teach his courses effectively and efficiently.

“What we may have to do strictly, legally speaking is use the actual item which would be technically cumbersome and distracting,” he said. “If we were adhering to the letter of the law we would not have the ability to use the materials that we would normally.”

Should the bill pass, Allan said his teaching would be severely restricted.

“It is preventing us from doing what we do in a way that we see as being productive and beneficial enacting an unfair constraint,” he said. “We have a lot of great tools in our hands, it would be a same for us to not be able to use them.”

The Film Studies Association of Canada (FSAC) has issued its own statement regarding the new proposed copyright reform legislation. In it, FSAC expresses its concerns about Bill C-61 limiting their rights as scholars and educators. In the document, the FSAC calls out for “a truly balanced copyright act, which would protect the rights of creator and copyright holders and the legitimate rights of users of copyright material.”

Outside the classroom, Bill C-61 could have serious implications for those who upload or download files from peer-to-peer networks.

People caught downloading material such as mp3s or videos will be subjected to fines of $500 per incident. But, if a defendant testifies they were unaware they infringed on copyright the fine could be reduced to $200.

Current Canadian copyright law allows for the legal downloading of sound recordings while the downloading of movies is deemed copyright infringement and is criminalized.

Uploading a file onto a network like YouTube could result in a lawsuit of $20,000 per file.

In her first year at Queen’s, Ayan Ga’al, ArtSci ’11, discovered DC++, a free peer-to-peer file sharing network popular among students living in residence.

“Everyday I downloaded something whether it be a movie or a song. It’s good because it makes downloading easy,” she said. “DC is an amazing tool because it allows you to download movies, music and lecture notes all in one place.”

Ga’al said she was shocked to hear her money-saving activity could potentially have legal implications but said she won’t change her downloading habits anytime soon.

“I’d probably take my chances … although I would probably try to incorporate iTunes into my everyday life,” he said.

Ga’al said downloading music and movies is so ingrained into the fabric of Canadian society, it would be difficult for people to stop the practice altogether, despite the government’s efforts to impose a financial deterrent.

“It’s so much a part of what we do,” she said. “It’s not about, ‘did you get this new CD?’ It’s ‘did you download this new song?’ Everybody downloads.”

Original here

Was It a Murder Conspiracy?

Murder Scene

Charlie Otero walked home from school under a crisp winter sky, almost giddy about the future. He'd aced his biology exam, and he was beginning to make friends in his new town. Charlie had always been a straight-A student and star athlete, outgoing and popular. But his family had moved from Panama to Wichita, Kansas, a few months earlier, and he'd been feeling off-kilter ever since. Now things were looking up.

Charlie, 15, planned to go to Wichita State University after high school; then he would follow his father, a recently retired master sergeant, into the Air Force. He yearned to distinguish himself as an officer, flying jets and earning a chestful of medals. "My father expected a lot from me," Charlie says. "I wanted to show him I could do it."

Otero in Albuquerque: "He didn't kill me. He didn't kill my heart."

On that January day in 1974, he crossed the suburban street to his family's neat white bungalow and saw that the garage door was open and his mother's car was missing. She was usually home to greet him after school. He walked around back, and the family dog bounded toward him across the snow. No one ever let Lucky -- a German shepherd mix with a habit of biting strangers -- outside alone. Charlie stepped into the kitchen and noticed a half-made peanut butter sandwich sitting on the table beside an empty lunch box. Then he saw his father's wallet tossed onto the stove, its contents strewn across the top.

His brother Danny, 14, and sister Carmen, 13, had returned home just minutes before. Suddenly Charlie heard Carmen shout, "Come quick! Mom and Dad are playing a bad joke on us!"

From the doorway of his parents' bedroom, Charlie saw Joseph Sr., 38, on the carpet by the bed. He had been strangled with a belt, and his handsome features were grotesquely swollen. Charlie's mother, Julie, 34, lay on the mattress; a length of clothesline was cinched around her neck. Both of them had been bound with thin cord at the wrists and ankles.

"What have you done?" Charlie wailed.

The phone was dead, so Danny ran to a neighbor, who called the police. When the patrol car pulled up, three of the five Otero kids were sobbing on their front lawn. Charlie relayed what he'd seen inside to the police officers, adding that two other siblings -- Josephine, 11, and Joseph Jr., 9 -- were still at school. A search of the house turned up the missing children, however. Joey had been asphyxiated with a plastic bag in his bedroom. Josie's partially clad body was hanging from a pipe in the basement.

"I hated God for allowing this to happen to my family," says Charlie, a former altar boy. "I lost my religion the minute I saw my mother lying there."

The Otero killings baffled the Wichita authorities, but Charlie suspected that his father's military career had included clandestine work, and he seized on the notion that the murders were related to Joseph's double life. Joseph, a Puerto Rican immigrant to New York City like his wife, had joined the U.S. Air Force in 1952 and wore the uniform for more than two decades. The family moved from postings in England, where Charlie was born, to Camden, New Jersey, and then, their expanding brood in tow, to Panama for seven years. There, at the Inter-American Air Forces Academy, Joseph taught military personnel from all over Latin America to repair Phantom fighter jets and C-130 cargo planes. Charlie says his father often disappeared for weeks at a time, flying on missions that he refused to discuss.

In Wichita, where Joseph retired and took a job at an airfield maintaining private planes, Charlie recalled troubling omens. One day, his father sent him to make sure that a phone company truck was parked outside when a repairman stopped by unannounced. Another time, Joseph shooed Charlie from the room to make a telephone call. Listening through the door, the boy heard him mention work for the Air Force Office of Special Investigations, the service's counter_intelligence agency. Soon after that, Joseph's car was mysteriously run off the road. Returning from the hospital with two broken ribs, he offered Charlie his signet ring. "If anything happens to me," he said, "I want you to have this."

"I told him, 'You'll probably outlive me, old man,'" Charlie recalls. "'Keep it.'" Days later, Joseph, his wife, and their two youngest children were dead.

The Conspiracy Theory

Charlie and his surviving siblings were sent to live in Albuquerque, New Mexico, where one of their father's Air Force buddies had offered to raise them alongside his own six kids. But before long, Charlie withdrew from his siblings and new family. He began to obsess about his theory that his loved ones had been murdered by a team of assassins on the wrong side of his father's intelligence work -- and that the killers would return to finish the job. "I always thought someone was coming to get me," he says.

Back in Wichita, investigators probed several conspiracy scenarios. "We tried to follow up on leads in the direction of Joseph's military work," says Gary Caldwell, one of the first detectives on the case. "We even sent a couple of investigators to Panama." They came up dry.
Charlie Otero
Joseph Otero
Julie Otero
BTK Killer
Otero Family
PHOTOGRAPHED BY DAN WINTERS
Otero in Albuquerque: "He didn't kill me. He didn't kill my heart."
javascript:void(0);
MCT/LANDOV
Joseph Otero, Chalire's father. Charlie suspected Joseph's military career was a reason for his murder.
javascript:void(0);
MCT/LANDOV
Julie Otero and her husband Joseph were the killer's first victims.
javascript:void(0);
JEFF TUTTLE/AP IMAGES
Denis Rader was convicted in 2005.
javascript:void(0);
LARRY W. SMITH/GETTY IMAGES
Charlie and siblings Carmen and Danny attended Rader's sentencing.
javascript:void(0);
Joseph Otero
MCT/LANDOV
Joseph Otero, Chalire's father. Charlie suspected Joseph's military career was a reason for his murder.

Fearing for his and his siblings' lives, Charlie kept people at bay, neglected his schoolwork, and spent most of his time racing motorcycles. After graduating from high school, he managed to get into the University of New Mexico, but his crime-scene flashbacks and nightmares made it hard to concentrate on his studies.

Charlie switched to a vocational institute, then drifted to Las Cruces, where a Honda dealership hired him as a mechanic. After he was injured in a traffic accident, he wound up in a dispute with the hospital over his unpaid bills. When the judge ruled against him, Charlie says, "I went outlaw."

He quit his job and got by on freelance work -- rebuilding Harleys, selling handguns, and breeding pit bulls and Dobermans -- for clients who didn't need to see his ID. He figured that without a paper trail, a hit squad would have a harder time finding him. He began drinking heavily and using drugs, becoming lost among his increasingly embattled thoughts.

By 1987 he was living with a girlfriend, Lynette Shafer, in a remote desert area in New Mexico. Their house was a shack made of shipping containers from a local missile range, encircled by barbed wire and guarded by attack dogs. Carved into the hillside behind it was an abandoned jail in which Billy the Kid was briefly imprisoned a hundred years earlier. Sometimes Charlie would sequester himself for days behind the lockup's steel-plate door. "Nobody could get to me," he says.

When Lynette announced that she was pregnant, Charlie sent her back home to Wisconsin to have the baby, whom she named Joseph, after Charlie's father and brother. Just weeks later, the couple cut off all communication with each other. Both believed that Charlie's would-be assassins might harm the child as well -- and that letters or phone calls might be intercepted by the killers.

In time, Charlie found a new girlfriend and became the father of two daughters. "I loved those girls," he says. "We'd go to the park with the dogs. I'd take them motorcycle riding." But neither Charlie, then in his mid-30s, nor the children's mother, not yet 20, was able to fully care for them. When the girls were four and five, the couple separated. Charlie tried to stay in touch, but that grew difficult after he married a woman with bipolar disorder and a taste for methamphetamine.

Then came an event that would again change Charlie's life. He became a plaintiff's witness in a civil lawsuit his wife had filed. While doing a routine background check on Charlie, the attorney received case files on the Otero family murders. That day, while the two were having lunch at a Mexican restaurant, he asked Charlie, "Have you ever heard of the BTK killer?"

"No," Charlie said.

The lawyer told him that a serial killer who went by the initials BTK for what he did to his victims -- bind, torture, and kill -- had long ago contacted a Wichita newspaper claiming responsibility for the Otero murders and vowing to strike again. And he did: Over the next 12 years, he committed at least four more murders in the Wichita area. The victims, each a woman, were trussed up with elaborate knots and strangled slowly.

BTK's subsequent messages for investigators took the form of macabre poetry, puzzles, and gruesome works of art. He knew details of the murders that the police had not made public. He wrote that he had a "monster" inside him. He sent half a dozen notes in all, then, in 1988, stopped all correspondence. The trail went cold.

Charlie was stunned -- and angry -- when the lawyer finished recounting what he'd learned. Wichita investigators had failed to share this break in the case with him when it came to light 24 years earlier. "In these types of investigations, there's a whole lot you don't want to let out," says retired detective George Scantlin, who worked on the case. "The initial messages were kept confidential and used as an investigative tool."

Still, something didn't add up for Charlie: How could just one person have subdued his father, an ex-commando, and his mother and siblings, all of whom had trained in judo? "I said, 'This is bull -- I'll never believe it,' " Charlie recalls.

Never-Ending Troubles

He couldn't know it yet, but the hunt for BTK would eventually help turn his life around. At the moment, though, his troubles seemed never-ending. Charlie's wife called the police after an argument and accused him of trying to choke her with a coat hanger. He denied it, but facing a charge of attempted murder, he accepted the prosecutor's bargain and pleaded guilty to aggravated battery. In October 2001, he began a 44-month sentence at Western New Mexico Correctional Facility.

In prison, Charlie worked as a mechanic and took courses in computer programming and astronomy. He spent hundreds of hours reflecting on his tormented history and even started attending chapel. "I was doing good in prison," he says. "It was like a revitalization."
Charlie Otero
Joseph Otero
Julie Otero
BTK Killer
Otero Family
PHOTOGRAPHED BY DAN WINTERS
Otero in Albuquerque: "He didn't kill me. He didn't kill my heart."
javascript:void(0);
MCT/LANDOV
Joseph Otero, Chalire's father. Charlie suspected Joseph's military career was a reason for his murder.
javascript:void(0);
MCT/LANDOV
Julie Otero and her husband Joseph were the killer's first victims.
javascript:void(0);
JEFF TUTTLE/AP IMAGES
Denis Rader was convicted in 2005.
javascript:void(0);
LARRY W. SMITH/GETTY IMAGES
Charlie and siblings Carmen and Danny attended Rader's sentencing.
javascript:void(0);
Julie Otero
MCT/LANDOV
Julie Otero and her husband Joseph were the killer's first victims.

Charlie spent the 30th anniversary of his family's murders behind bars. A few weeks later, one of his cellmates called out to him, "Hey, Charlie, your mom's on TV!" A news program was reporting that BTK had resumed his communication with a coded message to The Wichita Eagle. Pictures of victims BTK had claimed flashed onscreen one by one, including those of Charlie's parents, sister, and brother. The return of the killer rekindled his rage; later that day, he beat on a punching bag at the gym. "I was like a grenade with the pin pulled," he recalls.

The next day, Charlie wrote to the producers of America's Most Wanted, identifying himself as a relative of four of the Wichita victims. They asked him for an interview from prison. Newspaper reporters began calling, too, and a woman who'd seen him on TV volunteered to design a website on which Charlie could field questions about the case.

With the spotlight back on his family, Charlie's old nightmares -- images of his loved ones' screaming faces and tortured bodies -- kicked up. But his waking hours held a note of hope. By breaking the silence he'd enveloped himself in for so many years, Charlie dreamed of tempting the killer out of hiding. Perhaps, he thought, BTK would leave some DNA on his next letter. "I dared him to come for me when I was on prison road crew," Charlie recalls. "I thought, If he runs me over, maybe somebody will see his license plate."

BTK sent nine more notes and packages to the media and police over the following months. Two were decorated with New Mexico-themed postage stamps, which Charlie interpreted as directed at him. But the most astonishing communiqué came in December. It was a call to Charlie from a 16-year-old Wisconsin boy named Joseph. "This is your son," said the voice on the phone. "I'm looking forward to meeting you."

Charlie walked out of prison into a cold rain on January 3, 2005, ready to make amends with the world. The first person he visited was his sister Carmen, now a mentor to at-risk kids in Albuquerque. He apologized to her for his years of estrangement, and the two spent the afternoon talking as they hadn't since childhood. Later he called Danny, who was working as a cable installer in Phoenix. Their conversation had the same tone of forgiveness, and they vowed to stay in closer touch. He got a room at a halfway house not far from Carmen's place and found a job as a day laborer.

He was clearing brush on a landscaping job the next month when he got a call from Carmen. "They got him," she said, and Charlie's adrenaline pumped so intensely that he uprooted shrubs as if they were dandelions.

Dennis Rader, a 59-year-old Cub Scout leader and father of two, confessed to ten murders as the BTK killer. Rader was the compliance officer for a Wichita suburb and president of the congregation at Christ Lutheran Church. He had remained undetected for 31 years, until he sent police a message on a floppy disk that was traceable to his church computer. To make sure Rader was their man, investigators obtained a DNA sample. It showed a strong resemblance to samples taken at several BTK crime scenes.

Charlie and his siblings attended Rader's trial, listening as he described without remorse how he'd stalked their mother, Julie, and young Josie, planning to torture them to death after getting rid of Joey, and how he'd clipped the phone line and waited by the back door for a chance to get in. Rader said he'd been surprised to find Joseph Sr. home that morning but had a pistol to keep the situation under control.

Redemption

During Rader's testimony, Charlie calmed himself by thinking of the people who cared for him, his long-lost family members and the hundreds of strangers who'd written to him after seeing him on television. "I wanted to kill him," he says of Rader, "but I didn't want to hurt them."

At Rader's sentencing, Charlie, Danny, and Carmen cried as prosecutors showed photos from the crime scene inside their neat white house. BTK would soon be condemned to ten life terms. But for Charlie, any sense of resolution would have to wait.
Charlie Otero
Joseph Otero
Julie Otero
BTK Killer
Otero Family
PHOTOGRAPHED BY DAN WINTERS
Otero in Albuquerque: "He didn't kill me. He didn't kill my heart."
javascript:void(0);
MCT/LANDOV
Joseph Otero, Chalire's father. Charlie suspected Joseph's military career was a reason for his murder.
javascript:void(0);
MCT/LANDOV
Julie Otero and her husband Joseph were the killer's first victims.
javascript:void(0);
JEFF TUTTLE/AP IMAGES
Denis Rader was convicted in 2005.
javascript:void(0);
LARRY W. SMITH/GETTY IMAGES
Charlie and siblings Carmen and Danny attended Rader's sentencing.
javascript:void(0);
BTK Killer
JEFF TUTTLE/AP IMAGES
Denis Rader was convicted in 2005.

During the lunch break, he got a call from his ex-girlfriend Lynette: Their son Joseph, 17 years old, had been hit by a car while riding his bike near his Wisconsin home. He was in a coma, and the doctors didn't know if he'd live.

Parole rules forbade Charlie to travel without permission. He worked the phones, wrangling with the authorities to allow him to fly the next day to Wisconsin. But before leaving one tragedy behind for what could be the beginning of another, he planned to address the court.

The next morning, family members of the victims spoke with restraint and dignity. When it was Charlie's turn, he stood ramrod straight. "Dennis Rader did not ruin my life," he said in a strong, clear voice. "He caused me to challenge my faith, separated me from my loved ones, and changed my future forever … but despite Dennis Rader's efforts to destroy my family, we survive."

Carmen spoke, too, mourning those she had lost. Then the three siblings embraced, and Charlie boarded a plane to meet his son, Joseph Otero Shafer, for the first -- he hoped not the last -- time.

Charlie spent a week at Joe's bedside. He told the boy how much he loved him and promised to take him hunting and fishing as soon as he got better. And while Joe gave no sign of hearing his father, he did not die. He finally emerged from his coma three months later. His mother nursed him back to health at home. Charlie traveled from New Mexico to visit Joe when he could and called him several times a week.

Now, at 20, Joe has some cognitive and memory problems as a result of the accident but has recovered sufficiently to work two part-time jobs. He hopes to go to college someday. And he adores his father. "He's a lovely, caring person," he says. "We talk about everything -- life, work, home. It's great to know he's finally there."

Charlie is determined to right other important relationships. He's working to restore ties with his two daughters, now teenagers, who had been placed in his brother's custody shortly before Charlie went to prison. He has found a nurturing mate in Linda Evans, a Wichita native who attended the trial as part of her job aiding victims' families. "I've seen him blossom" since the trial, she says. "The anger has gone away."

The couple share a house trailer with two small dogs in Albuquerque. They travel occasionally around the country to screenings of a new documentary movie, Feast of the Assumption: The Otero Family Murders -- made by another former Kansan, Marc Levitz. Charlie talks to audiences about his story, hoping it will help others find solace in hard times. He's taking a course to further hone his public speaking skills.

Charlie still believes there's more to the Otero family murders than Rader admitted -- he has never fully let go of his conspiracy theory. But with the killer locked away forever in a maximum security cell, Charlie no longer dreams of death.

Instead, he's busy remaking his life. "If there's a heaven, I want my mom and dad to look down and be proud," he says. "I want my family to know I'm going to make it."

Original here

China to Limit Web Access During Olympic Games

Foreign journalists at the main press center on the Olympic Green in Beijing on Wednesday.

By ANDREW JACOBS
BEIJING — The International Olympic Committee failed to press China to allow fully unfettered access to the Internet for the thousands of journalists arriving here to cover the Olympics, despite promising repeatedly that the foreign news media could “report freely” during the Games, Olympic officials acknowledged Wednesday.

Since the Olympic Village press center opened Friday, reporters have been unable to access scores of Web pages — among them those that discuss Tibetan issues, Taiwanese independence, the violent crackdown on the protests in Tiananmen Square and the Web sites of Amnesty International, the BBC’s Chinese-language news, Radio Free Asia and several Hong Kong newspapers known for their freewheeling political discourse.

The restrictions, which closely resemble the blocks that China places on the Internet for its citizens, undermine sweeping claims by Jacques Rogge, the International Olympic Committee president, that China had agreed to provide full Web access for foreign news media during the Games. Mr. Rogge has long argued that one of the main benefits of awarding the Games to Beijing was that the event would make China more open.

“For the first time, foreign media will be able to report freely and publish their work freely in China. There will be no censorship on the Internet,” Mr. Rogge told Agence France-Presse just two weeks ago.

But a high-ranking Olympic committee official said Wednesday that the panel was aware that China would continue to censor Web sites carrying content that the Chinese propaganda authorities deemed harmful to national security and social stability. The panel acquiesced to China’s demands to maintain such controls, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not the designated public spokesman for the International Olympic Committee.

It was not immediately clear if China had provided special Internet links for overseas journalists working at the press center in the Olympic Village. But Chinese officials, speaking about the Internet restrictions on Wednesday, said they would not allow foreign journalists to visit Web sites that violated Chinese laws.

In its negotiations with the Chinese over Internet controls, the Olympic committee official said, the panel insisted only that China provide unregulated access to sites containing information useful to sports reporters covering athletic competitions, not to a broader array of sites that the Chinese and the Olympic committee negotiators determined had little relevance to sports.

The official said he now believed that the Chinese defined their national security needs more broadly than the Olympic committee had anticipated, denying reporters access to some information they might need to cover the events and the host country fully. This week, foreign news media in China were unable to gain direct access to an Amnesty International report detailing what it called a deterioration in China’s human rights record in the prelude to the Games.

“We are quite stunned by the decision, but we will survive this mess,” the official said. Sandrine Tonge, the media relations coordinator for the committee, said it would press the Chinese authorities to reconsider.

Chinese officials initially suggested that any troubles journalists were having with Internet access probably stemmed from the sites themselves, not any steps that China had taken to filter Web content. But Sun Weide, the chief spokesman for the Beijing Olympic organizing committee, acknowledged Wednesday that journalists would not have uncensored Internet use. “It has been our policy to provide the media with convenient and sufficient access to the Internet,” Mr. Sun said. “I believe our policy will not affect reporters’ coverage of the Olympic Games.”

Mr. Sun said foreigners using the Internet in China would be subject to the same laws under which censors blocked access to a wide range of Web sites thought to be detrimental to stability. China has long maintained that its laws governing Internet access do not amount to censorship and are similar to restrictions on pornography or gambling sites in many countries.

The restrictions were the latest in a string of problems that have tarnished the prelude to the Olympics, which open Aug. 8. China struggled to contain ethnic unrest in Tibetan areas this spring. The global torch relay that China organized to promote the Games was disrupted by protests. Air pollution in Beijing has remained severe despite efforts to reduce it.

In recent months, human rights advocates have accused Beijing of stepping up the detention and surveillance of those it fears could disrupt the Games. On Tuesday, President Bush met with five Chinese dissidents at the White House to drive home his dissatisfaction with the pace of change. Mr. Bush, who will attend the opening ceremonies in just over a week, also pressed China’s foreign minister to ease political repression.

The White House also urged China to lift its restrictions on the Internet. “We want to see more access for reporters, we want to see more access for everybody in China to be able to have access to the Internet,” the White House press secretary, Dana Perino, said Wednesday.

On Capitol Hill, Senator Sam Brownback, Republican of Kansas, introduced a resolution on Tuesday urging China to reconsider what he said were its plans to force international hotel chains to track electronic communications by its guests. At a news conference, he introduced redacted documents that he said were provided by the hotels requiring them to install government software to monitor Internet traffic during the Olympics.

Concerns about media access to the Internet intensified Tuesday, when Western journalists working at the Main Press Center in Beijing said they could not get to Amnesty International’s Web site to see the group’s report on China’s rights record.

T. Kumar, Amnesty International’s Asia advocacy director, said he thought the government hoped it could dissuade reporters from pursuing stories about human rights issues by blocking their access to Internet-based information. “This sends the wrong message not only to journalists but to anyone on his or her way to the Olympics,” he said.

It was not clear how hard Olympic committee officials pushed for open access to the Internet during negotiations with the Chinese, which dated from to the decision to award Beijing the Games in 2001, or why Mr. Rogge, the Olympic chief, promised that the news media would have uncensored access during the Games when officials working for him were aware that China would keep at least some of its censorship policies in place.

Kevan Gosper, press chief of the International Olympic Committee, was quoted by Reuters on Wednesday as saying that I.O.C. officials had agreed that China could block sites that would not hinder reporting on the Games themselves. “I also now understand that some I.O.C. official negotiated with the Chinese that some sensitive sites would be blocked on the basis they were not considered Games-related,” he told Reuters.

The senior Olympic committee official said the committee pressed hardest for unfiltered access to sites that sports reporters would need to cover athletic competitions. He said such sites included some that had been blocked in China in the past, including Wikipedia, but did not include political sites run by groups that the Beijing government considers hostile, like the spiritual sect Falun Gong.

Jonathan Watts, president of the Foreign Correspondents Club of China, said he was disappointed that Beijing had failed to honor its agreement to temporarily remove the firewall that prevented Chinese citizens from fully using the Internet.

“Obviously if reporters can’t access all the sites they want to see, they can’t do their jobs,” he said. “Unfortunately such restrictions are normal for reporters in China, but the Olympics were supposed to be different.”

Original here