Sunday, January 11, 2009

U.S. Plans Border ‘Surge’ Against Any Drug Wars

Guillermo Arias/Associated Press

Mexican soldiers patrolling after a shootout in Tijuana.

By RANDAL C. ARCHIBOLD

The soaring level of violence in Mexico resulting from the drug wars there has led the United States to develop plans for a “surge” of civilian and perhaps even military law enforcement should the bloodshed spread across the border, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said Wednesday.

Mr. Chertoff said the criminal activity in Mexico, which has caused more than 5,300 deaths in the last year, had long troubled American authorities. But it reached a point last summer, he said, where he ordered specific plans to confront in this country the kind of shootouts and other mayhem that in Mexico have killed members of warring drug cartels, law enforcement officials and bystanders, often not far from the border.

“We completed a contingency plan for border violence, so if we did get a significant spillover, we have a surge — if I may use that word — capability to bring in not only our own assets but even to work with” the Defense Department, Mr. Chertoff said in a telephone interview.

Officials of the Homeland Security Department said the plan called for aircraft, armored vehicles and special teams to converge on border trouble spots, with the size of the force depending on the scale of the problem. Military forces would be called upon if civilian agencies like the Border Patrol and local law enforcement were overwhelmed, but the officials said military involvement was considered unlikely.

Mr. Chertoff has expressed concern in recent months about the violence in Mexico, but the contingency plan has not been publicly debated, and the department has made no announcement of it. Department officials said Mr. Chertoff had mentioned it only in passing.

Aides to members of the House Homeland Security Committee, which oversees the department and has often clashed with Mr. Chertoff over his border policies, said Wednesday that they had heard little about the plan, though they welcomed it.

“We support almost anything to secure our border,” said Dena Graziano, a spokeswoman for the committee.

Mr. Chertoff said that he had advised Gov. Janet Napolitano of Arizona, nominated by President-elect Barack Obama to succeed him as homeland security secretary, that “I put helping Mexico get control of its borders and its organized crime problems” at the very top of the list of national security concerns.

Ms. Napolitano’s confirmation hearing begins next week. Her office denied requests for an interview.

In the wide-ranging interview with Mr. Chertoff, two weeks before he leaves office, he suggested that his controversial efforts to rapidly build a fence along nearly 700 miles of the Mexican border, as well as his bolstering the size of the Border Patrol, were part of the push to defend against drug violence, not just to control illegal immigration.

“That’s another reason, frankly, why I have been insistent on putting in the infrastructure and fencing and stuff like that,” he said. “Because I don’t want, God forbid, if there is ever a spillover of significance, to have denied the Border Patrol anything they need to protect the lives and safety of American citizens.”

He said the Border Patrol had reached a target of more than 18,000 agents by December, though some are still in training and not yet patrolling. Officials of the agents’ union contend that the rapid buildup, to a size double that of less than a decade ago, and the agency’s turnover have resulted in a largely inexperienced corps.

Fencing has gone up on 580 miles of the 2,000-mile border, short of the planned 661 miles, but Mr. Chertoff said he expected it to reach the final mark sometime in the coming months.

And though he said he regretted not seeking more advice initially from the Border Patrol on developing the “virtual fence,” the much-publicized and much-delayed system of cameras and sensors to supplement border personnel, Mr. Chertoff predicted that it would gain widespread use in the coming years.

Mr. Chertoff said the department’s efforts to increase enforcement at the border and conduct immigration raids at workplaces had led to the lowest level of illegal immigration in decades, though he acknowledged that the recession had also had an impact on the number of illegal border crossings.

He expressed no regret over the department’s tactics, often criticized by immigrants’ advocates as draconian and a cause of family separation, and disputed critics who suggest that the department is sprawling and in need of “reform.”

Mr. Obama used that word in introducing Ms. Napolitano and describing what she would bring to the job of overseeing a department created in 2003 out of 22 agencies and now employing more than 200,000 people, making it the third-largest cabinet-level department.

There has been speculation in Washington that the Obama administration will reinstate the Federal Emergency Management Agency as an independent body outside of the department. But Mr. Chertoff said that as part of the Homeland Security apparatus, FEMA had redeemed itself after an admittedly poor response to Hurricane Katrina in 2005. He pointed to more recent disaster responses, including the generally praised federal reaction to Hurricane Gustav on the Gulf Coast last summer.

“What I would not do,” he said, “is start to monkey around with the major working parts, because that is only going to set us back.”

Original here

Customer Bills Phone Company For Time Wasted, Gets Paid

By Meg Marco

It's the dream of every angry customer — sending a bill to the company that wasted your time. Well, it's finally happened.

Howard Schaffer was having such an awful time with his phone company that he alerted the local media — who ran a column about the debacle. That happens all the time, but what makes this case interesting is that Howard was keeping a record of the time he spent dealing with the phone company (One Communications of Rochester, NY) as well as the expenses that he was racking up while the phone company apologized over and over, but didn't fix the problem.

“I’ve received nine apologies,” Schaffer, whose phone bill is usually around $500 a month, told the Times-Union. As time dragged on, he was forced to have employees use cellphones and to borrow a phone from his landlord. The phone company promised at least $2,000 in credits, but no phone service.

After the column ran and his problem was resolved — Howard tallied up the expenses and sent One Communications a bill. For $5,481.16. And the company agreed to pay it.

You can learn a few things from Mr. Shaffer, who is a PR professional by trade. Follow his example by taking detailed notes of all the time and money you spend dealing with an issue. You might not be able to get a check for your expenses, (unless, perhaps, your story gets published in the newspaper like Mr. Shaffer's did) but it certainly can't hurt.

Hold My Calls. All of them. [Times-Union]
$5,481 check is in the mail after phone snarl [Times-Union] (Thanks, Laura!)
(Photo: nfarley )

Original here

Prosecutors Point to Signed Checks in Opposing Bail for Madoff

By ALEX BERENSON

Pressing the case that Bernard L. Madoff should have his $10 million bail revoked, federal prosecutors said in court documents on Thursday that investigators found 100 signed checks worth $173 million in Mr. Madoff’s desk on the day of his arrest.

The checks, which were to be distributed to family members, employees and friends, are another indication that Mr. Madoff, the financier accused of running a $50 billion Ponzi scheme, has tried to hide assets from his investors, prosecutors wrote in a brief to Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis of United States District Court in Manhattan.

On Monday, prosecutors asked Judge Ellis to revoke Mr. Madoff’s bail, contending that Mr. Madoff and his wife, Ruth, had violated his bail conditions by mailing more than $1 million in valuables to family members in late December. By mailing the valuables, Mr. Madoff showed that he may be a flight risk, prosecutors said.

“When the defendant’s office desk was searched, investigators found approximately 100 signed checks totaling more than approximately $173 million, ready to be sent out,” two assistant United States attorneys, Marc O. Litt and Lisa A. Baroni, wrote in a letter to the judge. “The only thing that prevented the defendant from executing the plan to dissipate those assets was his arrest by the F.B.I. on Dec. 11.”

The prosecutors also criticized Mr. Madoff for referring to the jewelry and watches that he mailed to his sons in late December as personal items. “What may be merely sentimental baubles to the defendant are, in the posture of this case, valuable assets that may comprise a meaningful part of the assets available to be forfeited,” they wrote.

They also called Mr. Madoff’s explanation that he had mailed the jewelry and watches in an effort to reach out to friends and family “preposterous,” adding, “That’s what telephones, e-mails and personal letters are for.”

Lawyers for Mr. Madoff have said he should not have his bond revoked but should instead remain under 24-hour house arrest at his luxury Manhattan apartment. Mr. Madoff has surrendered his passport, is wearing an electronic ankle bracelet and is under guard, so he does not represent a flight risk and should not be jailed, they said.

Judge Ellis may rule on the government’s request as early as Friday.

Meanwhile, in London, Britain’s Serious Fraud Office opened an investigation on Thursday into Mr. Madoff’s business operations to unearth possible criminal offenses.

The British agency called on investors, clients, former employees and other stakeholders to step forward and help with the investigation, which intends to “discover the truth behind the collapse of these huge financial structures,” its director, Richard Alderman, said in a statement. The agency said it had set up a special hot line and calls had already started to come in Thursday afternoon.

The investigation was prompted by an interim report about the British businesses by Grant Thornton, which is acting as the provisional liquidator of Mr. Madoff’s operations in London, and followed talks with government authorities. The agency will work closely with the F.B.I. and other organizations in the United States.

The London businesses of Mr. Madoff were managed through Madoff Securities International, based in the wealthy Mayfair neighborhood that is home to many London hedge funds. The business is incorporated in Britain and documents filed with a British registry show that the unit had about $170 million in assets when Mr. Madoff’s firm, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities L.L.C., collapsed last month.

Original here